Nov. 2

By the time this is read by all but a few, the events of this day will already be playing out in full effect.

Whether or not there is a GOP landslide, the question which may be left unanswered is if the landslide signals real change.

I think there are some key races which will signal something bigger than just a new boss overseeing the same old system:

1. Reid-Angle - if Harry Reid wins it will be a major disappointment and will likely portend a night that will not meet expectations; if he wins comfortably, look for headlines about a GOP failure.

2. O'Donnell-Coons - A comfortable Coons victory means that little has changed. A close race means the Tea Party is growing in power and is not going away. An O'Donnell victory signals a massive revolt and that big changes will occur in short order.

3. Hartzler-Skelton - A bellewether of business as usual. Skelton is representative of "the club" and has had an easy go for decades. A defeat will be almost as apocalyptic as the DE race.

4. WA and CA - The races for the Senate and CA governor will be coming in as the outcome is becoming clearer. If 2 or 3 go Republican, it will establish the grass roots as a new power broker.

Let's watch and see and tonight or in the morning I will analyze what the results will probably mean for us, for them, and how the losers are likely to react.

Consensus Conformity in Practice - Part 1

I could have never imagined that such an obvious example of consensus conformity would have have played out on a public stage as happened just a couple of days ago.

In case you missed it, Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell asked her opponent, Chris Coons, where separation of church and state was found in the Constitution. In the typical sniggering fashion of all statists, he replied that it was in the 1st amendment (as the audience laughed). If you haven't seen or heard the exchange, you can catch it here...and many other places.

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=6972772n


Don't be confused by the text, because CBS, like most of the other mainstream media and Chris Coons, is dead wrong and, hard as it may be to grasp, candidate O'Donnell was right to question her opponent (it is not shown as often, but Mr. Coons also failed to recall the 5 freedoms which are actually included in the 1st amendment).

The "wall of separation" and "separation of church and state" (frequently including an appeal to authority by invoking the sacred name of Thomas Jefferson) are fallback positions for those of the statist persuasion whenever they find themselves contradicted by reality and the imprinted circuits of there modified brains are beginning to sizzle. The consensus conformity here is that there is a constitutional protection from having to ever confront any religious ideas.

Too bad for the media, Chris Coons, and all those soon-to-be incompetent lawyers, that was the exact opposite of what Jefferson, et al, meant by the idea.

If you want to learn a tad more, check out this short review:


http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/lpbr/subpages/reviews/Dreisbach104.htm

Why can we not take the country back? Because the only ones left who really understand the problems are the same ones the Stepford elites want to destroy.